Wednesday 25 March 2009

Hope not Hate

Signing the Hope not Hate petition in the Council Chamber today

The Bishop of Manchester spoke at Full Council for the first time in living memory today to boldly warn us of the dangers of the BNP.

It was a stark, clear, bold warning, and a very impressive speech. All three party leaders spoke in favour of a motion about the Manchester 'Hope not Hate' campaign.

I was very proud to be both a Christian and a Manchester City Councillor today. Here's a response I posted on the MEN website when discussing whether it was right for the Bishop to criticise a political party:

As a Christian Manchester City Councillor, today was a very proud day for me. My party, my Council and my Church all had the courage, conviction and boldness to stand up to the homophobic racist fascist thugs who peddle hate, fear and division in our society.

In an open democracy it would be entirely wrong for us to ban extremist parties from standing for election - but equally - it would be entirely wrong to exclude important elements of a free society (such as the Church) from boldly speaking out against such parties.

To exclude any religious or non-religious group from engaging in the political system would be as perverse to our democratic system as banning extremist groups themselves - and this is our mark of tolerance and fair play.

I'm proud that the Britain I live in is so tolerant and even handed, and that we have our ideological battles in an open, largely peaceful democratic system - it demonstrates an agreeable degree of civility.

This would all be put at risk if we open the door to intolerant extremists, and I would strongly urge those tempted to vote for them to look at the whole picture and to listen to both sides of the argument.

Tuesday 24 March 2009

Petition now in


Many thanks to all those on the Rose Cottage campaign that came out for the photo call last night. It was for the handing in of the Rose Cottage Petition at the town hall, and we got a fairly good turn out for the time of day (about 20 at 6pm).

I'm in the process of uploading pictures, and a few of them are on-line here.

Here's one of my favourites, its of the tenants who are (from left to rightPeter Johnson, Breeze Hill, Hasty Lane and Oliver, Jamie and Anthony Lowe, Rose Cottage, Hasty Lane.

The petition has over 1020 names now on it and we actually hand it to the planning department tomorrow.

Due to the demonstrated public opposition to these plans we hope the Planning Department will now recommend refusal

It can easily do so on a number of planning policies, but the clearest one is PPG15, the economic justification for demolishing a listed building.

PPG15 states that the economic argument for demolishing the listed building is of such magnitude, that it substantially outweighs the considerbale heritage protection it currents enjoys.

As air freight has almost halved in recent months, the economic arguments for expanding air freight capacity no longer stack up.

Friday 13 March 2009

Marie Louise Gardens tragedy - applications approved!

Marie Louise Gardens - this lodge will now be extended
and a new development built inside the gardens

I was at the Planning and Highways committee at the town hall yesterday - two main items that interested me most: An application in Northenden to turn an estate agents into a fast food outlet (I was opposing - it got deferred), and the monster application that has been ping-ponging around South Manchester politics for a good couple of years now was the proposed development at Marie Louise Gardens.

To summarise, a Mr Bennett bought the old gardeners lodge (see above) from someone who had bought it off the gardener when he bought it in a right-to-buy effort. The Lodge sits inside the park (that is locked in the evenings), and it's associated grounds to the north.

Marie Louise Gardens was bequeathed to the citizens of Manchester in 1903 by Josephine Silkenstadt, in memory of her daughter, Marie Louise, who died young, with a covenant that the gardens should retain intact and not be developed on. The developer applied to extend the lodge and build a new building inside the gardens.

His justification (and the planning department who supported his application), is that the lodge and the associated land (which he owns) is not really part of the gardens - that it was designated as a dwelling, and so was the associated land to the north that was used as a depot.

Mr Bennett originally put in an application to extend the lodge and build a new property partly on land owned by the park, back in December 2006. Labour used their majority to pass this application, but it was held up until December 2007 because a strong local campaign was mounted to prevent the sale of the park land. Over 6000 people signed the petition, which drew universal support from the surrounding area, including Northenden.

Eventually the exec member of Parks, my predecessor Mike Kane, turned down the sale of the land, and the application couldn't go ahead. New plans were therefore drawn up that didn't include the purchase of land, and these plans were being discussed yesterday.

The application was heard. Those objecting who spoke were:

Jinny Shaw - who represented Didsbury and Northenden Civic Society, West Didsbury residents Association and Friends of Marie Louise Gardens.
John Leech MP - MP covering Didsbury West
Cllr Lianne Williams - Didsbury West, where MLG were
Myself - MLG is just outside my ward and many residents use it

Jinny was excellent, and powerfully put the case against. John and Lianne were also excellent, pin pointing the areas of planning protocol that weren't addressed. I represented the views of Northenden residents.

Bennett had his solicitor speak on his behalf.

The committee then discussed the matter. It came to light that the Highways department had only just received a late report that day, and hadn't even had a chance to read it. Nevertheless the planning department was still recommending approval.

Cllr Sandiford (Lib-Dem) highlighted this and moved that the application is deferred so that Highways can comment on this report - he was outnumbered by Labour members who voted in favour of an immediate straight yes or no vote on the application.

Cllr Sandiford then delivered a masterful case against the development. Cllr Lyons (Labour) said simply he was in favour of this and moved to approve. A vote was taken and 5 Labour Councillors voted for approval, 1 abstained, all 3 Lib-Dem councillors and 1 Labour councillor voted against approval. The application was therefore approved.

Those who voted for approval were (all Labour):

Cllr Lyons (Higher Blackley)
Cllr Fender (Old Moat)
Cllr Morrison (Fallowfield)
Cllr Ali (Moss Side)
Cllr Chohan (Longsight)

Those against (3 Lib Dem, 1 Labour):

Cllr Sandiford (Didsbury East)
Cllr Grant (Whalley Range)
Cllr Ramsbottom (City Centre)
Cllr Watson (Labour - Whalley Range)

Abstained

Cllr Keller (Sharston)

What made this vote especially galling is that during the Didsbury West bye-election, Labour leaflets were full of assertions that Labour was fully in favour of retaining the gardens, and against any future developments. Indeed ex-Cllr Mike Kane once addressed the Friends of MLG AGM stating how the Council is committed to preserving the gardens.

Local residents feel massively betrayed.

Tuesday 10 March 2009

Rose Cottage Update

1000 people have now signed the petition!!

Joy of joys!

Finally, the Rose Cottage petition has just reached it's target of 1000 signatures.
We are now ready to submit the petition to the Airport and, if need be, the Council.

May I thank everyone who has signed, and asked others to sign. Special thanks to those who collected using the paper version, and sent these in.


Leader of Green Party lends us her support

More great news is that Dr Caroline Lucas MEP, leader of the Green Party has also given us her support. In a press release she is quoted as saying:

"Rose Cottage is an important piece of local heritage, but this is definitely not just a local issue. If Manchester airport increases its air freight capacity, Rose Cottage won't be the only casualty. There will be bad consequences in terms of climate change, as well local traffic generation, local air and noise pollution and resulting ill-health effects.

The airport will talk about jobs, but the truth is that we can create huge numbers of jobs by greening the economy. Manchester and North West England could become major centres, and even leaders, of the green industrial revolution that Britain urgently needs.

We could fund much of Britain's economic recovery if we stopped giving aviation its billions of pounds of tax breaks every year, and if we made airports and airlines pay the full costs of their pollution. And Manchester airport could start by developing a proper sustainable development strategy. That would mean scrapping plans for new air freight facilities - and Rose Cottage would be saved."



10th consequtive slump in Air Freight at airport - 90 job cuts announced

February figures released last week show a continued decline in Air Freight at Manchester Airport:

These figures were released on the same week that the Airport sadly announced they were cutting 90 jobs.

Our thoughts are with those whose jobs are threatened.